Chicago, St. Paul, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Latta
226 U.S. 519 (1913)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Chicago, St. Paul, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Latta, 226 U.S. 519 (1913)

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and

Omaha Railway Company v. Latta

No. 231

Argued Mach 8, 11, 1912

Reargued October 22, 23, 1912

Decided January 6, 1913

226 U.S. 519

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

Decided on authority of Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, ante, p. 226 U. S. 491, and C., B. & Q. Ry. v. Miller, ante, p. 226 U. S. 513.

172 F. 850 reversed.

The facts, which involve the validity under the Carmack Amendment of schedules of tariff rates based upon values, and the extent of the liability of carriers under bills of lading, are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE LURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action to recover the full value of two horses lost in the course of interstate transportation.

The defense, in substance, was that the plaintiff had declared the value of each of the animals to not exceed $100, and had signed a shipping contract wherein he agreed that that was the value, and that the company's liability in case of loss or damage should not exceed the agreed value. It was also shown that the schedule of tariff rates was based upon values, and that a higher rate was allowable if a higher value had been declared. It was claimed that a limitation of liability, made

Page 226 U. S. 520

for the purpose of obtaining the lower of alternative rates, was admissible under the provisions of the § 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584, c. 3591.

The circuit court instructed a verdict for the agreed value, ruling that the contract was valid and was controlled by the Interstate Commerce Acts. The circuit court of appeals reversed this judgment upon the ground that the contract was invalid under the Constitution of the State of Nebraska, and held the plaintiff entitled to recover the full value of the animals. 172 F. 850. The case was remanded to the circuit court, where, in pursuance of the judgment and opinion of the circuit court of appeals, the jury was instructed that it should find the actual value of the animals lost, and return a verdict for that amount. Upon a second writ of error, this judgment was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals, and the cause has come to this Court upon a writ of certiorari.

The case is governed by the cases of Adams Express Company v. Croninger and C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Miller, both just decided.

Judgment reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.