Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein
219 U.S. 114 (1911)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114 (1911)

Shallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, Nebraska

No. 445

Argued December 8, 1910

Decided January 3, 1911

219 U.S. 114

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Syllabus

Following, and on the authority of, Noble State Bank v. Haskell, ante, p. 219 U. S. 104, sustaining the Bank Depositors' Guaranty Fund Acts of Oklahoma, held that a similar act of Nebraska providing for a guaranty fund and prohibiting banking except by corporations formed under the act, is not unconstitutional.

172 F. 999 reversed.

The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the banking act of Nebraska, creating a depositors' guaranty fund, are stated in the opinion.

Page 219 U. S. 120

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit by many banks to prevent the Banking Board of Nebraska from carrying out and enforcing an act similar to the Oklahoma statute just passed upon. It forbids banking except by a corporation formed under the act, and provides for a guaranty fund. The circuit court held the statute unconstitutional, and issued an injunction against the enforcement of it. 172 F. 999. For the reasons given in the foregoing case, the decree of the circuit court must be reversed.

Decree reversed.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.