Rumford Chem. Works v. Hygienic Chem. Co. - 215 U.S. 156 (1909)


U.S. Supreme Court

Rumford Chem. Works v. Hygienic Chem. Co., 215 U.S. 156 (1909)

Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Company

Nos. 9, 121

Argued November 1, 1909

Decided November 29, 1909

215 U.S. 156

Syllabus

Although in subsequent cases a party may have proved his facts, the question, when here, must be decided on the evidence below in the particular case.

Although one not a party may have contributed to the expenses of a former suit by reason of business or indirect interest, if it is not shown he had any right to participate in the conduct of the case, he is not bound as a privy.

Where the circuit court and circuit court of appeals of the same circuit agree on certain facts, this Court will not reverse the finding in a case coming from that circuit notwithstanding the same fact may not have been found by the courts of another circuit.

154 F. 65 affirmed; 157 F. 436 reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 215 U. S. 158



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.