VALDES v. MUNICH - 212 U.S. 568 (1909)


U.S. Supreme Court

VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)

212 U.S. 568

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH
No. 457.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
O. M. WOOD

No. 473.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
MARIA VENEGA PERIANES

No. 474.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 1, 1909

Page 212 U.S. 568, 569

Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159, 48 S. L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339, 50 L. ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80, 50 L. ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73, 51 S. L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.