VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)

212 U.S. 568

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH
No. 457.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
O. M. WOOD

No. 473.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
MARIA VENEGA PERIANES

No. 474.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

VALDES v. MUNICH, 212 U.S. 568 (1909)  212 U.S. 568

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
VENTURA MUNICH
No. 457.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
O. M. WOOD

No. 473.

RAMON VALDES, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
MARIA VENEGA PERIANES

No. 474.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 1, 1909

Page 212 U.S. 568, 569

Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, John G. Carlisle, and Henry A. Stickney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Willis Sweet for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of Error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, chap. 191, 31 Stat. at L. 77, 34, 35; act of March 2, 1901, chap. 812, 31 Stat. at L. 953, 3; Royal Ins. Co. v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159, 48 S. L. ed. 385, 388, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 247; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339, 50 L. Ed. 1055, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80, 50 L. Ed. 942, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Garrozi v. Dastas, 204 U.S. 64, 73, 51 S. L. ed. 369, 376, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224.