Johnson v. MueserAnnotate this Case
212 U.S. 283 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court
Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U.S. 283 (1909)
Johnson v. Mueser
Argued January 12, 1909
Decided February 23, 1909
212 U.S. 283
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Frasch v. Moore,211 U. S. 1, followed to effect that decisions of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in appeals from the Commissioner of Patents are not reviewable by this Court.
Writ of error to review 29 App.D.C. 61 dismissed, and certiorari denied.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE Fuller delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was a proceeding of interference in which the examiner of interferences awarded priority to Mueser. This decision was in turn affirmed by the examiners-in-chief and by the Commissioner. From the decision of the Commissioner, an appeal was taken to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, and that court affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, and directed that its own decision be certified to the Commissioner of Patents, as required by law. The court held that, in such a proceeding, it would not review the action of the Patent Office in deciding that the issue was a patentable one, but would confine its consideration to the question of priority alone. 29 App.D.C. 61. And, in the course of its opinion the court said:
"It must be borne in mind that the final judgment of this court entitling a claimant to a patent, in either an ex parte or an interference proceeding, is not conclusive of either patentability or priority. The patent, when issued, may be attacked in the courts by parties whose interests may be affected by the monopoly claimed thereunder, and the defeated party has another remedy by proceeding in a court of equity, as provided in § 4915, Rev.Stat."
We think our ruling in Frasch v. Moore,211 U. S. 1, is applicable, and that this writ of error must be disposed of accordingly. The application for certiorari must take the same course.
Writ of error dismissed.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.