Green v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.
205 U.S. 530 (1907)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Green v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co., 205 U.S. 530 (1907)

Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company

No. 435

Submitted April 8, 1907

Decided April 29, 1907

205 U.S. 530

Syllabus

While, in case of diverse citizenship, the suit may be brought in the circuit court for the district of the residence of either party, there must be service within the district, and if the defendant is a nonresident corporation, service can only be made upon it if it is doing business in that district in such a manner, and to such an extent as to warrant the inference that it is present there through its agent.

A railroad company which has no tracks within the district is not doing business therein in the sense that liability for service is incurred because it hires an office and employs an agent for the merely incidental business of solicitation of freight and passenger traffic.

147 F. 767 affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 205 U. S. 531

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.