Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Cisco Oil Mill
204 U.S. 449 (1907)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Cisco Oil Mill, 204 U.S. 449 (1907)

Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Cisco Oil Mill

No. 79

Submitted November 2, 1906

Decided February 25, 1907

204 U.S. 449

ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND

SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

Syllabus

Texas & Pacific Railway v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co., ante, p. 204 U. S. 426, followed as to abrogation by passage of Interstate Commerce Act of common law remedy for recovery of unreasonable freight charges on interstate shipment where rates charged were those duly fixed by the carrier according to the act and which had not been found unreasonable by Interstate Commerce Commission.

A tariff of rates of which schedules have been filed by a carrier with the Interstate Commerce Commission and also with its freight agents is in force and operative although the copies thereof may not have been posted in the carrier's depots as required by the act.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.