Looney v. Metropolitan R. Co.
200 U.S. 480 (1906)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Looney v. Metropolitan R. Co., 200 U.S. 480 (1906)

Looney v. Metropolitan Railroad Company

No. 173

Argued December 14, 15, 1905

Decided February 19, 1906

200 U.S. 480

Syllabus

In an action for damages for personal injuries, while the defendant has the burden of proof of contributory negligence, the plaintiff must. establish the grounds of defendant's liability, and to hold a master responsible, a servant must show by substantive proof that the appliances furnished were defective and knowledge of the defect or some omission in regard thereto. Negligence of defendant will not be inferred from the mere fact that the injury occurred, or from the presumption of care on the part of the plaintiff. There is equally a presumption that the defendant performed his duty.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.