James v. Appel
192 U.S. 129 (1904)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

James v. Appel, 192 U.S. 129 (1904)

James v. Appel

No. 108

Argued December 17, 1903

Decided January 4, 1904

192 U.S. 129

Syllabus

A statute copied from a similar statute of another state is generally presumed to be adopted with the construction which it already has received.

There is no unconstitutional assumption of judicial power, or anything inconsistent with the grant of common law jurisdiction to the courts of the territory, in the Legislature of Arizona enacting that motions for new trials are deemed to have been overruled if not acted upon by the end of the term at which made, the question to be subject to review by the supreme court as if the motion had been overruled by the court and exceptions reserved.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 192 U. S. 134

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.