Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. Co.
175 U.S. 348 (1899)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. Co., 175 U.S. 348 (1899)

Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company

Argued and submitted October 26-27, 1899

Decided December 11, 1899

175 U.S. 348

Syllabus

The following provisions in the first section of the Act of the Legislature of Indiana approved by the Governor of that state on the 4th day of March, 1893, viz.:

"That every railroad or other corporation, except municipal, operating in this state, shall be liable for damages for personal injury suffered by any employee while in its service, the employee so injured being in the exercise of due care and diligence, in the following cases: First. When such injury is suffered by reason of any defect in the condition of ways, works, plant, tools and machinery connected with, or in use in the business of such corporation, when such defect was the result of negligence on the part of the corporation or some person entrusted by it with the duty of keeping such way, works, plant, tools or machinery in proper condition. Second. Where such injury resulted from the negligence of any person in the service of such corporation, to whose order or direction the injured employee at the time of the injury was bound to conform, and did conform. Third. Where such injury resulted from the act or omission of any person done or made in obedience to any rule, regulation or bylaw of such corporation, or in obedience to the particular instructions given by any person delegated with the authority of the corporation in that behalf. Fourth. Where such injury was caused by the negligence of any person in the service of such corporation who has charge of any signal, telegraph office, switchyard, shop, roundhouse, locomotive engine or train upon a railway, or where such injury was caused by the negligence of any person, coemployee or fellow servant engaged in the same common service in any of the several departments of the service of any such corporation, the said person, co-employee or fellow servant at the time acting in the place and performing the duty of the corporation in that behalf, and the person so injured obeying or conforming to the order of some superior at the time of such injury, having the authority to direct; that nothing herein shall be construed to abridge the liability of the corporation under existing laws,"

as they are construed and applied by the supreme court of that state, are not invalid and do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

This case comes to this Court on the following certificate of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Page 175 U. S. 349

"In this case, duly argued and submitted to this court, there arises a question of law concerning which this court desires the instruction of the Supreme Court of the United States. The action was brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages for an injury suffered while in the employment of the defendant in error, caused by a negligent act of a fellow servant, for which the defendant in error is alleged to be responsible by force of an Act of the Legislature of Indiana approved by the governor of the state March 4, 1893. The first section of the act reads as follows:"

" 1. That every railroad or other corporation, except municipal, operating in this state, shall be liable in damages for personal injury suffered by any employee while in its service, the employee so injured being in the exercise of due care and diligence, in the following cases:"

" First. When such injury is suffered by reason of any defect in the condition of ways, works, plant, tools, and machinery connected with or in use in the business of such corporation, when such defect was the result of negligence on the part of the corporation or some person entrusted by it with the duty of keeping such way, works, plant, tools, or machinery in proper condition."

" Second. Where such injury resulted from the negligence of any person in the service of such corporation, to whose order or direction the injured employee at the time of the injury was bound to conform and did conform."

" Third. Where such injury resulted from the act or omission of any person done or made in obedience to any rule, regulation, or bylaw of such corporation, or in obedience to the particular instructions given by any person delegated with the authority of the corporation in that behalf."

" Fourth. Where such injury was caused by the negligence of any person in the service of such corporation who has charge of any signal, telegraph office, switchyard, shop, roundhouse, locomotive engine, or train upon on a railway, or where such injury was caused by the negligence of any person, co-employee, or fellow servant engaged in the same common service in any of the several departments of the

Page 175 U. S. 350

service of any such corporation, the said person, co-employee, or fellow servant at the time acting in the place, and performing the duty, of the corporation in that behalf, and the person so injured, obeying or conforming to the order of some superior at the time of such injury having the authority to direct; but nothing herein shall be construed to abridge the liability of the corporation under existing laws."

"For the entire act, reference is made to Session Laws of 1893, page 294, Burns' Annotated Indiana Statutes, Revision of 1894, paragraphs 7083 to 7087, inclusive."

"The Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company is a corporation of the State of Illinois owning and operating a railroad extending from Peoria, Illinois, into and through the State of Indiana. It is contended that the statute referred to is invalid because inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. If it be invalid, the declaration shows no cause of action, and the errors alleged to have been committed at the trial become immaterial. The opinion of this Court is that material error was committed at the trial for which the judgment below should be reversed if the statute mentioned is valid, and that if the statute mentioned is invalid, the judgment should be affirmed. The question whether that statute is valid or violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States the court hereby orders certified and submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States for its proper decision."

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.