Peck v. Heurich
167 U.S. 624 (1897)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Peck v. Heurich, 167 U.S. 624 (1897)

Peck v. Heurich

No. 289

Argued April 26-27, 1897

Decided May 24, 1897

167 U.S. 624

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

A judgment cannot be affirmed upon a ground not taken at the trial unless it is made clear beyond doubt that this could not prejudice the rights of the plaintiff in error.

Page 167 U. S. 625

By the common law, prevailing in the District of Columbia, an agreement by an attorney at law to prosecute at his own expense, a suit to recover land in which he personally has and claims no title or interest, present or contingent, in consideration of receiving a certain proportion of what he may recover is unlawful and void for champerty.

A deed conveying lands in the District of Columbia to an attorney at law and another person in trust that the grantees should sue for, take possession of, and sell the lands, and that the attorney should retain one-third of the proceeds after paying out of it all the costs and expenditures, and that the other two-thirds, clear of any costs or charges whatever, should be paid to the grantors, is void for champerty, and will not sustain an action by the grantees to recover part of the lands from third persons.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.