United States v. ShieldsAnnotate this Case
153 U.S. 88 (1894)
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Shields, 153 U.S. 88 (1894)
United States v. Shields
Submitted March 26, 1894
Decided April 16, 1894
153 U.S. 88
A district attorney whose place of abode is at a distance from the place at which court is held is not entitled to mileage for travel in going to his home every Saturday, and in returning to the place of holding court the following Monday morning, during the continuous session of the court.
Sunday is a nonjudicial day which does not interrupt the continuity of a term of court.
Fees allowed to public officers depend upon the provisions of the statute granting them, and are not open to equitable construction by the courts or discretionary action on the part of officials.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.