Hartranft v. Meyer
149 U.S. 544 (1893)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Hartranft v. Meyer, 149 U.S. 544 (1893)

Hartranft v. Meyer

No. 860

Argued April 11-12, 1893

Decided May 15, 1893

149 U.S. 544

Syllabus

Piece goods, commercially known and designated as "Chinas" and "marcelines," which are chiefly used for lining hats and bonnets are dutiable at the rate of twenty percentum ad valorem under Schedule N of the tariff Act of March 3, 1883, as materials "used for making . . . hats, bonnets, or hoods."

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.