Feibelman v. Packard
108 U.S. 14 (1882)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Feibelman v. Packard, 108 U.S. 14 (1882)

Feibelman v. Packard

Decided November 13, 1882

108 U.S. 14

I

N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Syllabus

A writ of error sued out by one of two or more joint defendants without a summons and severance or equivalent proceeding must be dismissed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Moses Feibelman and George Voelker, as partners, sued the defendants in error to recover damages for the seizure of their partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately. Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and

Page 108 U. S. 15

severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must be dismissed on the authority of Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414; Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416; Simpson v. Greeley, 20 Wall. 152, and it is

So ordered.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.