The Mamie
105 U.S. 773 (1881)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

The Mamie, 105 U.S. 773 (1881)

The Mamie

105 U.S. 773

Syllabus

Where a petition of the owner of a vessel claiming the benefit of the limited liability provided by sec. 4283 of the Revised Statutes was rejected and an appeal taken, held that this Court has jurisdiction where the aggregate amount claimed is more than $5,000 in excess of the value of the vessel.

The Mamie, a small pleasure-yacht propelled by steam, was run down and sunk by the steamer Garland in the Detroit River, July 22, 1880. More than fourteen passengers on the Mamie were drowned.

Thirteen different suits, each claiming damages in the sum of $5,000, were, under the statute of Michigan entitled "An Act requiring compensation for causing death by wrongful act, neglect, or default," brought in the Superior Court of Detroit, within the Eastern District of Michigan, against the owners of the Mamie, by the several administrators of the passengers who had perished by reason of the collision.

A petition in admiralty was filed in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan by the owners to obtain the benefit of a limitation of their liability to a sum not exceeding the amount or value of their interest in the yacht, and also to contest with each separate plaintiff in the State court (being summoned into the admiralty court) the question of any liability at all to him, and of the damages due to the estate of his interstate, if any, and to enjoin him from proceeding in the state court.

The court dismissed the petition. The decree was, on appeal, affirmed by the circuit court, and the petitioners thereupon appealed here.

A motion is now made to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, does not exceed the sum of $5,000. The conceded value of the Mamie was less than $5,000.

Page 105 U. S. 774

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.