Ottawa v. National Bank
105 U.S. 342

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Ottawa v. National Bank, 105 U.S. 342 (1881)

Ottawa v. National Bank

105 U.S. 342

Syllabus

1. Hackett v. Ottawa,99 U. S. 86, cited, and the doctrines therein set forth reaffirmed.

2. Municipal bonds in Illinois, payable to a person therein named or bearer, are transferable by delivery without endorsement, and the holder may sue in his own name to recover their contents.

3. Where, without express legislative authority, they are payable at a place in another state, quaere what law should govern in determining the rights of the holder who claims them by delivery only.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 105 U. S. 343

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.