Dietzsch v. Huidekoper
103 U.S. 494 (1880)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Dietzsch v. Huidekoper, 103 U.S. 494 (1880)

Dietzsch v. Huidekoper

103 U.S. 494

Syllabus

1. Kern v. Huidekoper, supra, p. 103 U. S. 485, cited and approved.

2. After the plaintiff removed to the proper circuit court of the United States a suit in replevin brought in a state court, the latter proceeded to try it and render judgment for a retorno habendo. An action having been thereupon brought in the state court against him and his sureties on the replevin bond, they filed their bill in the circuit court, praying that the plaintiff in that action be enjoined from further prosecuting it. Held that the circuit court properly granted the prayer of the bill.

3. The ruling in French, Trustee v. Hay, 22 Wall. 250, reaffirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Page 103 U. S. 495

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.