BUNNER v. NEIL
1 U.S. 457 (1789)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BUNNER v. NEIL, 1 U.S. 457 (1789)

1 U.S. 457 (Dall.)

Bunner
v.
Neil

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1789

This cause was removed by Habeas Corpus from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and, on the trial, a verdict was found in favor of the Plaintiff, for L4.10.8. which the defendant paid to the Prothonotary, and then moved to stay proceedings, contending, that as the Plaintiff's demand was reduced below L.10. by a direct payment, and not by discount, or set off, the Plaintiff must pay the costs.

The Plaintiff, on the other hand, obtained a rule to show cause, why the Defendant should not pay double costs, under the Act of Assembly, which provides, that, if the defendant removes the cause, and a sum under L. [Footnote 50] is found for the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay double costs.

Page 1 U.S. 457, 458

After argument, by Swift, for the Plaintiff, and Tilghman, for the Defendant, the rule to stay proceedings was made absolute; and the rule for payment of double costs, was discharged.


Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.